UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
Commission File No. 001-33794
HILLENBRAND, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Indiana (State of incorporation) | | 26-1342272 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
One Batesville Boulevard | | |
Batesville, IN | | 47006 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(812) 934-7500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer ý | | Accelerated filer o | | Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
The registrant had 63,110,562 shares of common stock, no par value per share, outstanding as of July 28, 2016.
HILLENBRAND, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Hillenbrand, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net revenue | $ | 371.0 |
| | $ | 398.7 |
| | $ | 1,109.7 |
| | $ | 1,204.8 |
|
Cost of goods sold | 227.5 |
| | 259.8 |
| | 695.3 |
| | 778.9 |
|
Gross profit | 143.5 |
| | 138.9 |
| | 414.4 |
| | 425.9 |
|
Operating expenses | 87.2 |
| | 79.1 |
| | 256.6 |
| | 247.0 |
|
Amortization expense | 7.2 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 25.6 |
| | 21.5 |
|
Interest expense | 6.6 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 18.9 |
| | 17.8 |
|
Other (expense) income, net | (0.3 | ) | | (1.3 | ) | | (1.9 | ) | | (6.3 | ) |
Income before income taxes | 42.2 |
| | 46.3 |
| | 111.4 |
| | 133.3 |
|
Income tax expense | 10.9 |
| | 13.8 |
| | 31.9 |
| | 39.9 |
|
Consolidated net income | 31.3 |
| | 32.5 |
| | 79.5 |
| | 93.4 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 0.6 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 1.1 |
|
Net income(1) | $ | 30.7 |
| | $ | 32.1 |
| | $ | 76.8 |
| | $ | 92.3 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Net income(1) — per share of common stock: | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
| | $ | 1.21 |
| | $ | 1.46 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 1.21 |
| | $ | 1.44 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) | 63.4 |
| | 63.3 |
| | 63.3 |
| | 63.2 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted) | 63.9 |
| | 63.9 |
| | 63.8 |
| | 63.8 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Cash dividends declared per share | $ | 0.2025 |
| | $ | 0.2000 |
| | $ | 0.6075 |
| | $ | 0.6000 |
|
(1) Net income attributable to Hillenbrand
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Hillenbrand, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Consolidated net income | $ | 31.3 |
| | $ | 32.5 |
| | $ | 79.5 |
| | $ | 93.4 |
|
Changes in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | | | |
Currency translation adjustment | (13.7 | ) | | 20.3 |
| | (9.3 | ) | | (36.3 | ) |
Pension and postretirement (net of quarter-to-date tax of $0.4 and $1.0 and year-to-date tax of $1.6 and $1.5) | 0.4 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 2.7 |
|
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments (net of quarter-to-date tax of $0.5 and ($0.8) and year-to-date tax of ($0.6) and $0.8) | (1.6 | ) | | 2.5 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | (1.8 | ) |
Total changes in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (14.9 | ) | | 23.7 |
| | (9.0 | ) | | (35.4 | ) |
Consolidated comprehensive income | 16.4 |
| | 56.2 |
| | 70.5 |
| | 58.0 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 2.3 |
| | 0.9 |
|
Comprehensive income (2) | $ | 16.1 |
| | $ | 55.9 |
| | $ | 68.2 |
| | $ | 57.1 |
|
(2) Comprehensive income attributable to Hillenbrand
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Hillenbrand, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(in millions)
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2015 |
ASSETS | |
| | |
|
Current Assets | |
| | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 47.6 |
| | $ | 48.3 |
|
Trade receivables, net | 175.4 |
| | 187.9 |
|
Unbilled receivables from long-term manufacturing contracts | 107.6 |
| | 144.9 |
|
Inventories | 163.3 |
| | 153.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 28.5 |
| | 21.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 22.6 |
| | 23.8 |
|
Other current assets | 17.8 |
| | 23.7 |
|
Total current assets | 562.8 |
| | 604.1 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net | 154.4 |
| | 158.3 |
|
Intangible assets, net | 548.4 |
| | 459.6 |
|
Goodwill | 635.8 |
| | 544.0 |
|
Other assets | 38.3 |
| | 42.1 |
|
Total Assets | $ | 1,939.7 |
| | $ | 1,808.1 |
|
| | | |
LIABILITIES | |
| | |
|
Current Liabilities | |
| | |
|
Trade accounts payable | $ | 112.7 |
| | $ | 104.3 |
|
Liabilities from long-term manufacturing contracts and advances | 75.6 |
| | 79.7 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt | 12.4 |
| | 9.4 |
|
Accrued compensation | 49.9 |
| | 62.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 23.3 |
| | 25.4 |
|
Other current liabilities | 127.2 |
| | 123.1 |
|
Total current liabilities | 401.1 |
| | 404.2 |
|
Long-term debt | 624.6 |
| | 518.7 |
|
Accrued pension and postretirement healthcare | 215.9 |
| | 218.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 31.9 |
| | 29.4 |
|
Other long-term liabilities | 30.2 |
| | 31.3 |
|
Total Liabilities | 1,303.7 |
| | 1,202.3 |
|
| | | |
Commitments and contingencies |
|
| |
|
|
| | | |
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | |
|
Common stock, no par value (63.7 and 63.6 shares issued, 63.0 and 62.9 shares outstanding) | — |
| | — |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 350.4 |
| | 350.9 |
|
Retained earnings | 410.0 |
| | 372.1 |
|
Treasury stock (0.7 and 0.7 shares) | (20.8 | ) | | (21.0 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (116.5 | ) | | (107.9 | ) |
Hillenbrand Shareholders’ Equity | 623.1 |
| | 594.1 |
|
Noncontrolling interests | 12.9 |
| | 11.7 |
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity | 636.0 |
| | 605.8 |
|
| | | |
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 1,939.7 |
| | $ | 1,808.1 |
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Hillenbrand, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow (Unaudited)
(in millions)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
Operating Activities | |
| | |
|
Consolidated net income | $ | 79.5 |
| | $ | 93.4 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | |
| | |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 46.2 |
| | 41.1 |
|
Trade name impairment | 2.2 |
| | — |
|
Deferred income taxes | (7.1 | ) | | 3.2 |
|
Share-based compensation | 6.2 |
| | 8.9 |
|
Net loss on investments | 0.1 |
| | 2.1 |
|
Trade accounts receivable and receivables on long-term manufacturing contracts | 56.6 |
| | 14.7 |
|
Inventories | 1.0 |
| | (9.9 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 6.6 |
| | (2.3 | ) |
Trade accounts payable | 7.2 |
| | (66.3 | ) |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | (23.8 | ) | | (23.5 | ) |
Income taxes payable | 8.9 |
| | 13.9 |
|
Defined benefit plan and postretirement funding | (8.2 | ) | | (7.7 | ) |
Defined benefit plan and postretirement expense | 8.7 |
| | 10.8 |
|
Other, net | 5.6 |
| | (2.9 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 189.7 |
| | 75.5 |
|
| | | |
Investing Activities | |
| | |
|
Capital expenditures | (15.6 | ) | | (19.7 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant, and equipment | 1.0 |
| | 0.7 |
|
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | (237.0 | ) | | — |
|
Other, net | 0.1 |
| | (1.2 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (251.5 | ) | | (20.2 | ) |
| | | |
Financing Activities | |
| | |
|
Repayments on term loan | (6.8 | ) | | (6.8 | ) |
Proceeds from revolving credit facilities | 480.5 |
| | 334.2 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facilities | (363.7 | ) | | (453.1 | ) |
Proceeds from Series A Notes, net of financing costs | — |
| | 99.6 |
|
Proceeds from other borrowings | — |
| | 2.2 |
|
Payments of dividends on common stock | (38.3 | ) | | (37.8 | ) |
Repurchases of common stock | (16.6 | ) | | (9.2 | ) |
Net proceeds on stock plans | 7.6 |
| | 3.5 |
|
Other, net | 1.1 |
| | 1.2 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 63.8 |
| | (66.2 | ) |
| | | |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents | (2.7 | ) | | (1.5 | ) |
| | | |
Net cash flows | (0.7 | ) | | (12.4 | ) |
| | | |
Cash and cash equivalents: | |
| | |
|
At beginning of period | 48.3 |
| | 58.0 |
|
At end of period | $ | 47.6 |
| | $ | 45.6 |
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Hillenbrand, Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(in millions, except share and per share data)
| |
1. | Background and Basis of Presentation |
Hillenbrand, Inc. (“Hillenbrand”) is a global diversified industrial company that makes and sells premium business-to-business products and services for a wide variety of industries. We strive to provide superior return for our shareholders, exceptional value for our customers, and great professional opportunities for our people through deployment of the Hillenbrand Operating Model (the “HOM”). The HOM is a consistent and repeatable framework designed to produce sustainable and predictable results. The HOM defines our mission, vision, values, and leader’s mindset; applies our management practices in Strategy Management, Segmentation, Lean, Talent Development, and Acquisitions; and prescribes three steps (Understand, Focus and Grow) to make our businesses both bigger and better. Our goal is to continue developing Hillenbrand as a world-class global diversified industrial company. Hillenbrand is composed of two segments: the Process Equipment Group and Batesville®. The Process Equipment Group businesses design, develop, manufacture, and service highly engineered industrial equipment around the world. Batesville is a recognized leader in the North American death care industry. “Hillenbrand,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and similar words refer to Hillenbrand and its subsidiaries.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Hillenbrand and its subsidiaries. They also include two minor subsidiaries where the Company’s ownership percentage is less than 100%. The Company’s fiscal year ends on September 30. Unless otherwise stated, references to years relate to fiscal years. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2016 presentation.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements and therefore do not include all information required in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as, and should be read in conjunction with, the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the SEC. The September 30, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet included in this Form 10-Q was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP for a year-end balance sheet included in Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of operations and cash flow as of the dates and for the periods presented.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Examples of such estimates include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method and the establishment of reserves related to customer rebates, doubtful accounts, warranties, early-pay discounts, inventories, income taxes, litigation, self-insurance, and progress toward achievement of performance criteria under the incentive compensation programs.
| |
2. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The significant accounting policies used in preparing these consolidated financial statements are consistent with the accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2015.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-8, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which includes amendments that change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Under ASU 2014-8, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-8 became effective and was adopted for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2015. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, and allows for either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption, with early adoption permitted on October 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. ASU 2014-12 states that a performance target in a share-based payment that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be accounted for as a performance condition. ASU 2014-12 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-12 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern. ASU 2014-15 provides guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. ASU 2014-15 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items. ASU 2015-01 eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. ASU 2015-01 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-01 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation: Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The new standard amends the consolidation guidance in ASC 810 and significantly changes the consolidation analysis required under current generally accepted accounting principles. ASU 2015-02 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2015-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest. ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest: Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements. This standard permits an entity to defer and present debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements as an asset and to subsequently amortize the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement. These new standards do not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 and ASU 2015-15 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software. ASU 2015-05 helps entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement by providing guidance as to whether an arrangement includes the sale or license of software. ASU 2015-05 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2015-05 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330). Under current FASB standards, an entity is required to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. Market could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin. ASU 2015-11 requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope of this update at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method. ASU 2015-11 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning October 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-11 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Business Combinations. ASU 2015-16 simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts. The amendments in ASU 2015-16 require that the acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer is also required to record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. In addition, an entity is required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2015-16 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes. ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred income tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position in order to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes. ASU 2015-17 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We expect that ASU 2015-17 will have a financial statement presentation impact only, as all deferred income tax assets and liabilities will be classified as noncurrent on the consolidated balance sheet.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right of use asset and related lease liability for leases that have lease terms of more than twelve months. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance, with the classifications based on criteria that are similar to those applied under the current lease guidance, without the explicit bright lines. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging: Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. ASU 2016-06 clarifies the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. ASU 2016-06 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-06 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 reduces complexity in the accounting for several aspects of share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification of certain share-based payment transactions on the statement of cash flows.
Accounting for Income Taxes: All excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Excess tax benefits should be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows.
Forfeitures: An entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur.
Minimum Statutory Tax Withholding Requirements: The threshold to qualify for equity classification permits withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions. Cash paid when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows.
ASU 2016-09 will be effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
We incurred $0.7 and $3.5 of business acquisition and integration costs during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016, recorded in operating expenses.
Abel
We completed the acquisition of Abel Pumps LP and Abel GmbH & Co. KG and certain of their affiliates (collectively “Abel”) on October 2, 2015, for €95 in cash. We utilized borrowings under our $700.0 revolving credit facility and $180.0 term loan (together, the “Facility”), to fund this acquisition. Based in Büchen, Germany, Abel is a globally-recognized leader in positive displacement pumps. Abel specializes in designing, developing, and manufacturing piston and piston diaphragm pumps as well as pumping solutions and in providing related parts and service. This equipment is sold under the ABEL® Pump Technology brand into the power generation, wastewater treatment, mining, general industry, and marine markets. The results of Abel are reported in our Process Equipment Group segment for the relevant periods.
Based on the preliminary purchase allocation, we recorded goodwill of $37, and acquired identifiable intangible assets of $58, which consisted of $5 of trade names not subject to amortization, $9 of developed technology, $3 of backlog, and $41 of customer relationships. Goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Supplemental proforma information has not been provided as the acquisition did not have a material impact on consolidated results of operations.
Red Valve
On February 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Red Valve Company, Inc. (“Red Valve”) for $131.9 in cash. We utilized borrowings under our Facility, to fund this acquisition. Based in Carnegie, Pennsylvania, Red Valve is a global leader in highly-engineered valves designed to operate in the harshest municipal and industrial wastewater environments. Its products support mission critical applications in water/wastewater, power and mining, and other general industrial markets. The results of Red Valve are reported in our Process Equipment Group segment for the relevant periods.
Based on the preliminary purchase allocation, we recorded goodwill of $61, and acquired identifiable intangible assets of $61, which consisted of $4 of trade names not subject to amortization, $8 of developed technology, $1 of backlog, and $48 of customer relationships. Goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Supplemental proforma information has not been provided as the acquisition did not have a material impact on consolidated results of operations.
| |
4. | Supplemental Balance Sheet Information |
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2015 |
Trade accounts receivable reserves | $ | 20.0 |
| | $ | 20.0 |
|
| | | |
Accumulated depreciation on property, plant, and equipment | $ | 298.7 |
| | $ | 295.2 |
|
| | | |
Inventories: | |
| | |
|
Raw materials and components | $ | 52.7 |
| | $ | 40.1 |
|
Work in process | 60.5 |
| | 63.9 |
|
Finished goods | 50.1 |
| | 49.6 |
|
Total inventories | $ | 163.3 |
| | $ | 153.6 |
|
| |
5. | Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are stated at the lower of cost or fair value. With the exception of most trade names, intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to 22 years, representing the period over which we expect to receive future economic benefits from these assets. We assess the carrying value of most trade names annually, or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate there may be impairment.
The following tables summarize the carrying amounts and related accumulated amortization for intangible assets as of June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2015 |
| Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Cost | | Accumulated Amortization |
Finite-lived assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Trade names | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) |
Customer relationships | 459.7 |
| | (94.6 | ) | | 374.0 |
| | (78.7 | ) |
Technology, including patents | 78.5 |
| | (32.0 | ) | | 62.3 |
| | (28.0 | ) |
Software | 45.8 |
| | (39.3 | ) | | 43.3 |
| | (37.7 | ) |
Other | 0.4 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 0.4 |
| | (0.3 | ) |
| 584.6 |
| | (166.3 | ) | | 480.2 |
| | (144.8 | ) |
Indefinite-lived assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Trade names | 130.1 |
| | — |
| | 124.2 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 714.7 |
| | $ | (166.3 | ) | | $ | 604.4 |
| | $ | (144.8 | ) |
As a result of the required annual impairment assessment performed in the third quarter of 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its indefinite-lived assets, and recorded a trade name impairment charge of $2.2 related to the Process Equipment Group segment on two trade names. The impairment charge was included in operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The decline in the estimated fair value of these trade names was largely driven by the decreased demand for equipment and parts used in coal mining and coal power.
The net change in intangible assets during the nine months ended June 30, 2016, included the acquisitions of Abel in October 2015 and Red Valve in February 2016 (see Note 3), offset by the impact of foreign currency fluctuations during the period, trade name impairment of $2.2 related to the Process Equipment Group segment, and normal amortization.
Goodwill
Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to annual impairment tests. Goodwill has been assigned to reporting units. We assess the carrying value of goodwill annually, or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Impairment testing is performed at a reporting unit level.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Process Equipment Group | | Batesville | | Total |
Balance September 30, 2015 | $ | 535.7 |
| | $ | 8.3 |
| | $ | 544.0 |
|
Acquisitions | 97.6 |
| | — |
| | 97.6 |
|
Foreign currency adjustments | (5.8 | ) | | — |
| | (5.8 | ) |
Balance June 30, 2016 | $ | 627.5 |
| | $ | 8.3 |
| | $ | 635.8 |
|
As a result of the required annual impairment assessment performed in the third quarter of 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its goodwill, and in all reporting units, fair value of goodwill was determined to exceed the carrying value, resulting in no impairment to goodwill.
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2015 |
$700 revolving credit facility (excluding outstanding letters of credit) | $ | 223.5 |
| | $ | 107.6 |
|
$180 term loan | 164.3 |
| | 171.0 |
|
$150 senior unsecured notes, net of discount | 149.2 |
| | 149.1 |
|
$100 Series A Notes | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
|
Other | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
Total debt | 637.0 |
| | 528.1 |
|
Less: current portion | 12.4 |
| | 9.4 |
|
Total long-term debt | $ | 624.6 |
| | $ | 518.7 |
|
With respect to the Facility, as of June 30, 2016, we had $9.8 in outstanding letters of credit issued and $466.7 of maximum borrowing capacity. $345.1 of borrowing capacity is immediately available based on our leverage covenant at June 30, 2016, with additional amounts available in the event of a qualifying acquisition. The weighted-average interest rates on borrowings under the Facility were 1.60% and 1.43% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016, and 1.32% and 1.29% for the same periods in the prior year. The weighted average facility fee was 0.24% and 0.21% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016, and 0.23% and 0.23% for the same periods in the prior year. The weighted average interest rate on the Facility’s term loan was 1.90% and 1.71% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016, and 1.56% and 1.55% for the same periods in the prior year. We have interest rate swaps on $50.0 of outstanding borrowings under the Facility in order to manage exposure to our variable rate interest payments.
In the normal course of business, the Process Equipment Group provides to certain customers bank guarantees and other credit arrangements in support of performance, warranty, advance payment, and other contractual obligations. This form of trade finance is customary in the industry and, as a result, we are required to maintain adequate capacity to provide the guarantees. As of June 30, 2016, we had credit arrangements totaling $208.7, under which $111.3 was utilized for this purpose. These arrangements included our €150.0 Syndicated Letter of Guarantee Facility (as amended, the “LG Facility”) and other ancillary credit facilities.
In March 2016, the Company entered into an amendment (the “Third Amendment”) to the Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2012 (as amended, the “Shelf Agreement”), among the Company, Prudential Investment Management (“PIM”) and each Prudential Affiliate (as defined thereunder), governing the 4.60% Series A unsecured notes (the “Series A Notes”). The Third Amendment extends the maturity date of the Shelf Agreement to March 24, 2019, and increases the aggregate principal amount available under the private shelf facility from $150.0 to $200.0, of which $100.0 has been drawn. The Shelf Agreement is an uncommitted facility; the issuance of notes under the Shelf Agreement is subject to successful placement by PIM.
The availability of borrowings under the Facility, the LG Facility, and the Shelf Agreement governing the Series A Notes is subject to our ability to meet certain conditions including compliance with covenants, absence of default, and continued accuracy of certain representations and warranties. Financial covenants include a maximum ratio of Indebtedness to EBITDA (as defined in the agreements) of 3.5 to 1.0 and a minimum ratio of EBITDA to interest expense of 3.5 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all covenants.
The Facility, our senior unsecured notes, Series A Notes, and LG Facility are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries.
We had restricted cash of $0.7 and $0.8 at June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015.
Defined Benefit Plans
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Pension Benefits | | Non-U.S. Pension Benefits |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Service costs | $ | 0.9 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
|
Interest costs | 2.4 |
| | 3.6 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 0.7 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (2.4 | ) | | (3.4 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs, net | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Amortization of net loss | 0.9 |
| | 1.3 |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
|
Net pension costs | $ | 1.9 |
| | $ | 2.7 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.9 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| U.S. Pension Benefits | | Non-U.S. Pension Benefits |
| Nine Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Service costs | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
|
Interest costs | 7.1 |
| | 10.8 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 2.1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (7.2 | ) | | (10.6 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs, net | 0.4 |
| | 0.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Amortization of net loss | 2.7 |
| | 3.9 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Net pension costs | $ | 5.9 |
| | $ | 8.0 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
| | $ | 2.7 |
|
Postretirement Healthcare Plans — Net postretirement healthcare costs were $0.0 and $(0.1) for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and $0.2 and $0.1 for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
Defined Contribution Plans — Expenses related to our defined contribution plans were $2.4 and $2.4 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and $7.0 and $6.9 for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
The effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were 25.8% and 29.8%. The decrease in the effective tax rate during the three months ended June 30, 2016, was primarily due to a favorable geographic mix of pre-tax income. The effective tax rates for the nine months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were 28.6% and 29.9%. The decrease in the effective tax rate during the nine months ended June 30, 2016, was primarily due to a favorable geographic mix of pre-tax income, partially offset by an increase in the reserve for unrecognized tax benefits.
The dilutive effects of performance-based stock awards were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share at the level the related performance criteria were met through the respective balance sheet date. At June 30, 2016 and 2015, potential dilutive effects, representing approximately 800,000 and 1,400,000 shares, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as the related performance criteria were not yet met, although we expect to meet various levels of criteria in the future.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net income(1) | $ | 30.7 |
| | $ | 32.1 |
| | $ | 76.8 |
| | $ | 92.3 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic - in millions) | 63.4 |
| | 63.3 |
| | 63.3 |
| | 63.2 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and other unvested equity awards (in millions) | 0.5 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 0.6 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted - in millions) | 63.9 |
| | 63.9 |
| | 63.8 |
| | 63.8 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
| | $ | 1.21 |
| | $ | 1.46 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.48 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | $ | 1.21 |
| | $ | 1.44 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Shares with anti-dilutive effect excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share (in millions) | 0.8 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.7 |
|
(1) Net income attributable to Hillenbrand
During the nine months ended June 30, 2016, we paid approximately $38.3 of cash dividends. We also repurchased approximately 557,000 shares of our common stock during the nine months ended June 30, 2016, for a total cost of approximately $16.6. In connection with our share-based compensation plans discussed further in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015, we also issued approximately 680,000 shares of common stock, of which approximately 576,000 shares were treasury stock.
| |
11. | Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension and Postretirement | | Currency Translation | | Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments | | Total Attributable to Hillenbrand, Inc. | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total |
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | (46.0 | ) | | $ | (4.9 | ) | | $ | (1.3 | ) | | $ | (52.2 | ) | | |
| | |
|
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Before tax amount | — |
| | (36.1 | ) | | (6.3 | ) | | (42.4 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (42.6 | ) |
Tax expense | — |
| | — |
| | 1.9 |
| | 1.9 |
| | — |
| | 1.9 |
|
After tax amount | — |
| | (36.1 | ) | | (4.4 | ) | | (40.5 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (40.7 | ) |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income(1) | 2.7 |
| | — |
| | 2.6 |
| | 5.3 |
| | — |
| | 5.3 |
|
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) | 2.7 |
| | (36.1 | ) | | (1.8 | ) | | (35.2 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (35.4 | ) |
Balance at June 30, 2015 | $ | (43.3 | ) | | $ | (41.0 | ) | | $ | (3.1 | ) | | $ | (87.4 | ) | | |
| | |
|
(1) Amounts are net of tax.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension and Postretirement | | Currency Translation | | Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments | | Total Attributable to Hillenbrand, Inc. | | Noncontrolling Interests | | Total |
Balance at September 30, 2015 | $ | (54.4 | ) | | $ | (52.1 | ) | | $ | (1.4 | ) | | $ | (107.9 | ) | | |
| | |
|
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Before tax amount | — |
| | (8.9 | ) | | — |
| | (8.9 | ) | | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | (9.3 | ) |
Tax expense | — |
| | — |
| | (0.5 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | — |
| | (0.5 | ) |
After tax amount | — |
| | (8.9 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (9.4 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | (9.8 | ) |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income(1) | 0.9 |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | 0.8 |
|
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) | 0.9 |
| | (8.9 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | | (8.6 | ) | | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | (9.0 | ) |
Balance at June 30, 2016 | $ | (53.5 | ) | | $ | (61.0 | ) | | $ | (2.0 | ) | | $ | (116.5 | ) | | |
| | |
|
(1) Amounts are net of tax.
Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income include:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
| Amortization of Pension and Postretirement (1) | | (Gain)/Loss on Derivative Instruments | | |
| Net Loss Recognized | | Prior Service Costs Recognized | | | Total |
Affected Line in the Consolidated Statements of Income: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Net revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
|
Cost of goods sold | 0.9 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 1.1 |
|
Operating expenses | 0.3 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
Other income (expense), net | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
|
Total before tax | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
|
Tax expense | |
| | |
| | |
| | (0.7 | ) |
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax | |
| | |
| | |
| | $ | 1.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
| Amortization of Pension and Postretirement (1) | | (Gain)/Loss on Derivative Instruments | | |
| Net Loss Recognized | | Prior Service Costs Recognized | | | Total |
Affected Line in the Consolidated Statements of Income: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Net revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.9 |
| | $ | 1.9 |
|
Cost of goods sold | 2.6 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 3.1 |
|
Operating expenses | 1.0 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 1.2 |
|
Other income (expense), net | — |
| | — |
| | 1.5 |
| | 1.5 |
|
Total before tax | $ | 3.6 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | 7.7 |
|
Tax expense | | | | | | | (2.4 | ) |
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax | | | | | | | $ | 5.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
| Amortization of Pension and Postretirement (1) | | (Gain)/Loss on Derivative Instruments | | |
| Net Loss Recognized | | Prior Service Costs Recognized | | | Total |
Affected Line in the Consolidated Statements of Income: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Net revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | (0.4 | ) |
Cost of goods sold | 0.6 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.7 |
|
Operating expenses | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
Other income (expense), net | — |
| | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
Total before tax | $ | 0.9 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | 0.4 |
|
Tax expense | | | | | | | 0.4 |
|
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax | | | | | | | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended June 30, 2016 |
| Amortization of Pension and Postretirement (1) | | (Gain)/Loss on Derivative Instruments | | |
| Net Loss Recognized | | Prior Service Costs Recognized | | | Total |
Affected Line in the Consolidated Statements of Income: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Net revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | (0.1 | ) |
Cost of goods sold | 1.8 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 2.0 |
|
Operating expenses | 0.7 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.8 |
|
Other income (expense), net | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total before tax | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 2.7 |
|
Tax expense | | | | | | | (1.9 | ) |
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax | | | | | | | $ | 0.8 |
|
(1) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 7).
| |
12. | Share-Based Compensation |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Share-based compensation costs | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
| | $ | 6.2 |
| | $ | 8.9 |
|
Less impact of income tax benefit | 0.9 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 2.3 |
| | 3.3 |
|
Share-based compensation costs, net of tax | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 3.9 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
|
We have share-based compensation with long-term performance-based metrics that are contingent upon our relative total shareholder return and the creation of shareholder value as measured by the cumulative cash returns and final period net operating profit after tax compared to the performance-based targets for each grant over a three-year period. For the performance-based awards contingent upon the creation of shareholder value, compensation expense is adjusted each quarter based upon actual results to date and any changes to forecasted information on each of the separate grants.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2016, we made the following grants:
|
| | |
| Number of Units |
Stock options | 497,774 |
|
Time-based stock awards | 42,262 |
|
Performance-based stock awards (maximum that can be earned) | 378,158 |
|
Stock options granted during fiscal 2016 had a weighted-average exercise price of $31.11 and a weighted-average grant date fair value of $7.80. Our time-based stock awards and performance-based stock awards granted during fiscal 2016 had weighted-average grant date fair values of $30.54 and $33.03. Included in the performance-based stock awards granted during 2016 are 199,372 units whose payout level is based upon the Company’s total shareholder return as it relates to the performance of companies in its compensation peer group over a three-year measurement period. These units are being expensed on a straight-line basis over the measurement period and are not subsequently adjusted after the grant date.
| |
13. | Other (Expense) Income, Net |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | (2.0 | ) |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss), net | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | (4.3 | ) |
Other, net | (0.7 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (1.9 | ) | | — |
|
Other income (expense), net | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | (1.3 | ) | | $ | (1.9 | ) | | $ | (6.3 | ) |
| |
14. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Like most companies, we are involved from time to time in claims, lawsuits, and government proceedings relating to our operations, including environmental, patent infringement, business practices, commercial transactions, product and general liability, workers’ compensation, auto liability, employment, and other matters. The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty. An estimated loss from these contingencies is recognized when we believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated; however, it is difficult to measure the actual loss that might be incurred related to litigation. If a loss is not considered probable and/or cannot be reasonably estimated, we are required to make a disclosure if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a significant loss may have been incurred. Legal fees associated with claims and lawsuits are generally expensed as incurred.
Claims other than employment and related matters have deductibles and self-funded retentions up to $0.5 per occurrence or per claim, depending upon the type of coverage and policy period. Outside insurance companies and third-party claims administrators assist in establishing individual claim reserves, and an independent outside actuary provides estimates of ultimate projected losses, including incurred but not reported claims, which are used to establish reserves for losses. Claim reserves for employment-related matters are established based upon advice from internal and external counsel and historical settlement information for claims and related fees when such amounts are considered probable of payment.
The recorded amounts represent our best estimate of the costs we will incur in relation to such exposures, but it is possible that actual costs will differ from those estimates.
| |
15. | Fair Value Measurements |
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The authoritative guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability, developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The categorization of financial assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels:
|
| |
Level 1: | Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2: | Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
Level 3: | Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Carrying Value at June 30, 2016 | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value at June 30, 2016 Using Inputs Considered as: |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
Assets: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 47.6 |
| | $ | 47.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Investments in rabbi trust | 3.8 |
| | 3.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Derivative instruments | 3.5 |
| | — |
| | 3.5 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
$150 senior unsecured notes | 149.2 |
| | 165.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Revolving credit facility | 223.5 |
| | — |
| | 223.5 |
| | — |
|
Term loan | 164.3 |
| | — |
| | 164.3 |
| | — |
|
$100 Series A Notes | 100.0 |
| | — |
| | 108.2 |
| | — |
|
Derivative instruments | 6.3 |
| | — |
| | 6.3 |
| | — |
|
The fair values of the Facility’s revolving credit facility and term loan approximated carrying value at June 30, 2016. The fair values of the Facility’s revolving credit facility, term loan, and Series A Notes are estimated based on internally developed models, using current market interest rate data for similar issues as there is no active market for these obligations.
The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments are based upon pricing models using inputs derived from third-party pricing services or observable market data such as currency spot and forward rates. These values are periodically validated by comparing to third-party broker quotes. The aggregate notional value of the derivative instruments was $215.1 at June 30, 2016. The derivatives are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the balance sheet.
| |
16. | Segment and Geographical Information |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net revenue | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Process Equipment Group | $ | 230.7 |
| | $ | 253.6 |
| | $ | 680.5 |
| | $ | 750.8 |
|
Batesville | 140.3 |
| | 145.1 |
| | 429.2 |
| | 454.0 |
|
Total | $ | 371.0 |
| | $ | 398.7 |
| | $ | 1,109.7 |
| | $ | 1,204.8 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Process Equipment Group | $ | 41.8 |
| | $ | 43.7 |
| | $ | 109.8 |
| | $ | 116.3 |
|
Batesville | 34.6 |
| | 32.2 |
| | 109.5 |
| | 108.9 |
|
Corporate | (9.3 | ) | | (9.7 | ) | | (26.6 | ) | | (30.1 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net revenue (1) | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
United States | $ | 208.9 |
| | $ | 226.6 |
| | $ | 627.8 |
| | $ | 679.3 |
|
International | 162.1 |
| | 172.1 |
| | 481.9 |
| | 525.5 |
|
Total | $ | 371.0 |
| | $ | 398.7 |
| | $ | 1,109.7 |
| | $ | 1,204.8 |
|
(1) We attribute revenue to a geography based upon the location of the legal entity that consummates the external sale.
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2016 | | September 30, 2015 |
Total assets assigned | |
| | |
|
Process Equipment Group | $ | 1,672.2 |
| | $ | 1,537.3 |
|
Batesville | 209.1 |
| | 224.9 |
|
Corporate | 58.4 |
| | 45.9 |
|
Total | $ | 1,939.7 |
| | $ | 1,808.1 |
|
| | | |
Tangible long-lived assets, net | |
| | |
|
United States | $ | 91.6 |
| | $ | 95.7 |
|
International | 62.8 |
| | 62.6 |
|
Total | $ | 154.4 |
| | $ | 158.3 |
|
The following schedule reconciles segment adjusted EBITDA to consolidated net income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Nine Months Ended June 30, |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Adjusted EBITDA: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Process Equipment Group | $ | 41.8 |
| | $ | 43.7 |
| | $ | 109.8 |
| | $ | 116.3 |
|
Batesville | 34.6 |
| | 32.2 |
| | 109.5 |
| | 108.9 |
|
Corporate | (9.3 | ) | | (9.7 | ) | | (26.6 | ) | | (30.1 | ) |
Less: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Interest income | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | (0.8 | ) | | (0.7 | ) |
Interest expense | 6.6 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 18.9 |
| | 17.8 |
|
Income tax expense | 10.9 |
| | 13.8 |
| | 31.9 |
| | 39.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 14.3 |
| | 12.7 |
| | 46.2 |
| | 41.1 |
|
Business acquisition and integration | 0.7 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 3.5 |
| | 0.7 |
|
Inventory step-up | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | 2.4 |
| | — |
|
Restructuring and restructuring related | 1.5 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 8.9 |
| | 2.4 |
|
Trade name impairment | 2.2 |
| | — |
| | 2.2 |
| | — |
|
Litigation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
Consolidated net income | $ | 31.3 |
| | $ | 32.5 |
| | $ | 79.5 |
| | $ | 93.4 |
|
| |
17. | Condensed Consolidating Information |
Certain 100% owned subsidiaries of Hillenbrand fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally, agreed to guarantee all of the indebtedness relating to our obligations under the Facility, senior unsecured notes, Series A Notes, and LG Facility. The following are the condensed consolidating financial statements, including the guarantors, which present the statements of income, balance sheets, and cash flows of (i) the parent holding company, (ii) the guarantor subsidiaries, (iii) the non-guarantor subsidiaries, and (iv) eliminations necessary to present the information for Hillenbrand on a consolidated basis.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
| Parent | | Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | | Parent | | Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 206.0 |
| | $ | 215.0 |
| | $ | (50.0 | ) | | $ | 371.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 225.9 |
| | $ | 222.4 |
| | $ | (49.6 | ) | | $ | 398.7 |
|
Cost of goods sold | — |
| | 101.3 |
| | 150.7 |
| | (24.5 | ) | | 227.5 |
| | — |
| | 121.9 |
| | 163.1 |
| | (25.2 | ) | | 259.8 |
|
Gross profit | — |
| | 104.7 |
| | 64.3 |
| | (25.5 | ) | | 143.5 |
| | — |
| | 104.0 |
| | 59.3 |
| | (24.4 | ) | | 138.9 |
|
Operating expenses | 8.9 |
| | 63.1 |
| | 40.7 |
| | (25.5 | ) | | 87.2 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 58.2 |
| | 35.7 |
| | (24.4 | ) | | 79.1 |
|
Amortization expense | — |
| | 2.9 |
| | 4.3 |
| | — |
| | 7.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 3.7 |
| | — |
| | 6.5 |
|
Interest expense | 6.0 |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 6.6 |
| | 5.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 5.7 |
|
Other income (expense), net | (0.1 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 1.6 |
| | (2.8 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | (1.3 | ) |
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries | 36.4 |
| | 2.8 |
| | — |
| | (39.2 | ) | | — |
| | 38.9 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | (39.1 | ) | | — |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes | 21.4 |
| | 41.1 |
| | 18.9 |
| | (39.2 | ) | | 42.2 |
| | 25.6 |
| | 40.3 |
| | 19.5 |
| | (39.1 | ) | | 46.3 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) | (9.3 | ) | | 14.7 |
| | 5.5 |
| | — |
| | 10.9 |
| | (6.5 | ) | | 15.0 |
| | 5.3 |
| | — |
| | 13.8 |
|
Consolidated net income (loss) | 30.7 |
| | 26.4 |
| | 13.4 |
| | (39.2 | ) | | 31.3 |
| | 32.1 |
| | 25.3 |
| | 14.2 |
| | (39.1 | ) | | 32.5 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
Net income (loss) (1) | $ | 30.7 |
| | $ | 26.4 |
| | $ | 12.8 |
| | $ | (39.2 | ) | | $ | 30.7 |
| | $ | 32.1 |
| | $ | 25.3 |
| | $ | 13.8 |
| | $ | (39.1 | ) | | $ | 32.1 |
|
Consolidated comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 16.1 |
| | $ | 27.0 |
| | $ | (1.3 | ) | | $ | (25.4 | ) | | $ | 16.4 |
| | $ | 55.9 |
| | $ | 26.2 |
| | $ | 38.5 |
| | $ | (64.4 | ) | | $ | 56.2 |
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) (2) | $ | 16.1 |
| | $ | 27.0 |
| | $ | (1.6 | ) | | $ | (25.4 | ) | | $ | 16.1 |
| | $ | 55.9 |
| | $ | 26.2 |
| | $ | 38.2 |
| | $ | (64.4 | ) | | $ | 55.9 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended June 30, 2016 | | Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
| Parent | | Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | | Parent | | Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
Net revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 621.1 |
| | $ | 638.5 |
| | $ | (149.9 | ) | | $ | 1,109.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 678.3 |
| | $ | 675.9 |
| | $ | (149.4 | ) | | $ | 1,204.8 |
|
Cost of goods sold | — |
| | 312.1 |
| | 456.5 |
| | (73.3 | ) | | 695.3 |
| | — |
| | 355.4 |
| | 498.1 |
| | (74.6 | ) | | 778.9 |
|
Gross profit | — |
| | 309.0 |
| | 182.0 |
| | (76.6 | ) | | 414.4 |
| | — |
| | 322.9 |
| | 177.8 |
| | (74.8 | ) | | 425.9 | |